Interesting, I havent gotten death threats but I am apparently going to be sentenced at the next Nuremberg trial for promoting experimental gene therapy. But also im going to jail bc Ive discussed that i believe ivermectin will ultimately be shown 2 have a + effect size in covid
-
-
High. Treatment decisions aren't no-risk. There's the argument about harms from drink driving vs punishment (moral culpability) too. 1/
-
Like in Australia if you speed drunk through a red light and there's nobody crossing the road you'll get your licence suspended. If a pedestrian happened to be there you get 10 years jail. I think this is wrong, there's no difference in the risks taken, just luck 2/
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
We cant allow "but HCQ..." to be the harbinger of therapeutic nihilism.
-
On the other hand there's "but methylprednisolone/dexamethasone." Based on the numbers needed to treat re: in hospital mortality, how many died awaiting physicians to accumulate a gigantic trial to spoonfeed them a conclusion their pathophys/pharm reasoning should have told them.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What's the moral culpability of saying something "doesn't work" or "has no effect" when it causes modest increases in death? What about saying not airborne or doesn't transmit human-to-human? Underfunding TTI? Setting high bar for vaccine adverse events while 'using' lockdowns?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's quite puzzling to me after all this time you still don't seem to be aware all of the harm reported from HCQ was from late-stage, overdosed trials (Solidarity, Recovery)
-
It pretty much says it all about medical research evaluation that the Oxford HCQ trials still stand. It's a much bigger problem than small fraudulent ivermectin studies but hey, we have to have priorities.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.