Once upon a time, physicians used clinical judgement and prescribed, and professional medical societies gave conditional recommendations for, interventions based on low or sometimes very low certainty data. No one called them miracles or referred to them by their veterinary use.
-
-
Yep. There's also the fact some fraud is genuinely undetectable. There's a ppt from the FDA in 2001 called "The F word", they went back and looked at whistleblower-disclosed fabrication and even knowing it was fraud still couldn't find red flags in the data in many cases.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hey you also get meaningless admiration from fellow nerds. Well done!
-
That's true. Well done Gideon and Kyle, and thank you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interesting, I havent gotten death threats but I am apparently going to be sentenced at the next Nuremberg trial for promoting experimental gene therapy. But also im going to jail bc Ive discussed that i believe ivermectin will ultimately be shown 2 have a + effect size in covid
-
It doesnt matter that mRNA doesnt interact with the genome and represents the safest vaccine vector, or that low certainty data and clinician judgement routinely guide practice.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I love that folks can so freely accuse you of “working for pharma,” without actually taking the sneakiest of peaks at how the hardcore IVM fanatics might just profit from their propaganda. It is mind blowing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.