More potential fraud in the ivermectin literature - my new piece builds on work by @K_Sheldrick on Brazilian data that looks very strangehttps://gidmk.medium.com/is-ivermectin-for-covid-19-based-on-fraudulent-research-part-2-a4475523b4e4 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @GidMK @K_Sheldrick
Ever since I heard you say quite a few absurd things on the Rebel Wisdom podcast, I have serious doubts about your actual agenda. Having said that, it won't stop me from looking at your findings and taking them seriously, obviously.pic.twitter.com/dHUI0WS1C5
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @GidMK @K_Sheldrick
1) you start by not answering to the actual argument, which is clearly articulated as "financial interests are trying to suppress ivermectin research". You pretend that the argument is "
@GidMK and error finders are being paid by Big Pharma" and start answering to that instead.2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @GabinJean3 @K_Sheldrick
I mean, financial interests are quite clearly not trying to suppress ivermectin research, given that there are now some really large trials of the drug being performed and out. And people regularly accuse me of being a paid shill, so it's a useful lie to address
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
The censorship you refer to is absolutely nonsensical, the papers that have been withdrawn have been done so due to fraud, and the lack of publication is mostly due to some extraordinarily bad research
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
And the biggest costs for people with any disease are incurred in hospitals, so your argument about dexamethasone is flatly incorrect. This is just a tedious Gish Gallop of nonsensical points as far as I can tell
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.