More potential fraud in the ivermectin literature - my new piece builds on work by @K_Sheldrick on Brazilian data that looks very strangehttps://gidmk.medium.com/is-ivermectin-for-covid-19-based-on-fraudulent-research-part-2-a4475523b4e4 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @GidMK @K_Sheldrick
Not the uncertainty and careful wording. He is paid to do this stuff.. I cannot detract from the huge clinical evidence base built up over the last 18 months. Ivermectin works, western science does not. Protecting big pharma profits is odious.
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Keith040856 @K_Sheldrick
I am certainly not paid to do this. I do receive a very modest sum for locking posts on Medium (average about $30 per post), but I can assure you that is the only income I receive to do this work
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @K_Sheldrick
There you go then, paid. Also, your rabid opposition to ivermectin must have other benefits, or you would change your focus to more important subjects, like vaccines.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Keith040856 @K_Sheldrick
I get paid no matter what I post about, and frankly I get fewer death threats by not posting on ivermectin. I almost didn't write this because the $30 is not worth the bullshit from people like you
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @K_Sheldrick
Not Bull shit. I follow clinical front line, covid facing doctors around the world. Their success in fighting covid put out health service to shame. I will always take practical, reproducible evidence over claims made by people that have never seen a covid patient.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You literally accused me of being a paid shill without even apparently reading my article. If that's not bullshit I don't know what is
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.