The whole thing is just...very odd. The p-values are also bizarre - I get a chi-squared p-value of 0.0005, not 0.036, for the last line
-
-
Great. The dataset will contain all patients - and you will see that approx. 2/3 underwent biochemical analysis, which is the report of this preliminary paper. Will send until this weekend. I hope I can count with your help in everything you notice. Thank you!
-
This entire table is wrong. You say the first column is n=44, but the actual numbers only work for a denominator of 43, which is supposedly the n for the second column.pic.twitter.com/46bBNjLdbv
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Impossible %s are everywhere, with this group of geniuses...pic.twitter.com/ZnXha9tuDK
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How soon do you think you can get the edits back to Flavio? Think he’ll add you to the manuscript as a third author?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did you get the dataset? I am quite curious to give a look at it.
-
Nem dataset, nem dataoito...

- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.