Today's paper that I'm checking is not ivermectin, another treatment for COVID-19, and thus far every single percentage I've looked at in every table is impossible Cited 18 times so far
-
-
Really weird. Either a terrible job at faking data or extremely sloppy, error strewn, work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is an easy quality check that I can begin using! Thank you :) I'm learning a ton from following youpic.twitter.com/d7kxPoPOmb
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These percentages are not wrong! They certainly included some dwarfs in the study.pic.twitter.com/5wHxdofr4b
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The first table they pretty obviously crossed the n value for each group, an n of 43 working for the first column and 44 for the second (though I didn’t check everything). But that still wouldn’t explain this one.pic.twitter.com/OkZ6x3S6Kh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.