This one feel free to have a look yourself:https://www.cureus.com/articles/50511-early-antiandrogen-therapy-with-dutasteride-reduces-viral-shedding-inflammatory-responses-and-time-to-remission-in-males-with-covid-19-a-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-interventional-trial-eat-duta-androcov-trial---biochemical …
-
-
Show this thread
-
It looks like the authors have mislabeled table 1, but the other tables I can't even explain. These percentages, for example, aren't possible for any values between 40-45 as far as I can tellpic.twitter.com/qbsP3iUHM0
Show this thread -
The whole thing is just...very odd. The p-values are also bizarre - I get a chi-squared p-value of 0.0005, not 0.036, for the last line
Show this thread -
For those wondering what I mean when I say "impossible"https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1428174111834923018?s=20 …
Show this thread -
Worth noting that lots of papers have one or two impossible values - often there is a person missing from one line in a table, that throws off the percentages. It's not ideal, but it's a very simple mistake It becomes worrying when this mistake is repeated a lot
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What does that mean?
-
oh just the usual fraud, or supposedly non-malicious incompetence, combined with err ahh undisciplined reviewers
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
haha, can already see a glaring reason why it wouldn't catch on with the typical rightwing crowd, no matter how juked the stats
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
