Oh dear. The @DataColada crew finding some *very* concerning features in this study.http://datacolada.org/98
-
-
It's not known that the fraud shared the data (although the Duke office of investigatory burial is working on it). But if that's what happened, remember there was sequence of events: balance problem, replication, etc. And the data had already been shared internally.
-
I don't just mean in this case - we've come across several datasets that have been posted online in the ivermectin literature that are clearly fake. Why would you do that?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
people don’t read foot notes. Definitely don’t check references. includes the titled authors sometimes. A bunch of shortcuts or fudges buried in a database that allow a postgrad a shot at a big time splash paper (tenure) is often undetected. And then there’s actual fraud.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.