Your regular reminder that "Focused Protection" from the Great Barrington Declaration is, and always was, absolute nonsensehttps://twitter.com/NDLoubere/status/1426672027239337989 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
So it was essentially a given that any place pursuing the GBD's primary focus of having no restrictions on anything would eventually expose all citizens to COVID-19
But the language was always this vague "protect the elderly" nonsense while the actual measures advocated for would by definition cause the elderly to be infected 
"The elderly can all get their own hotel rooms while the pandemic sweeps through" makes sense if you're talking about a 2-week peak of infections, perhaps, but not when we're 18 months in and some places are on to their 3rd, 4th, and 5th waves
Also, a fascinating fact is that most advanced economies DID protect their elderly population to an enormous extent, at least post April-2020. In most richer locations with serological data, people over-70 have MUCH lower infection rates than under-70
Note - this is important because it happened BEFORE the GBD proposed it, which goes to show that even with "focused protection" places can have enormous death tolls from COVID-19
Yeah, their "solutions" sounded as absurd as the garbage I heard from the deniers on the internet. Empty hotel rooms? LOL. And lots of "maybes" and "perhaps" in their plans.
Snap lockdown in NZ - winning strategy?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.