That's simply inaccurate - the residual confounding is likely to impact the results. For example, who is more likely to get tested and then get a pack? Etc
-
-
This is just hand-waving until you offer some - even if hypothetical - figures for the specific scenario we're talking about
-
He doesn't need to offer any estimate because the point is that uncontrolled confounding exists in these ridiculous, single-country ecological analyses, while not existing in well-done RCTs. Seriously, this is study design 101. https://twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan/status/1260373245011939335 … https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1426002445281288192 …pic.twitter.com/b7ioYauWnI
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.