Oh yes I've read that. A very big issue with residual confounding makes it quite hard to interpret, particularly given that there are some numeric errors in the tables
-
-
Oh hey, the authors acknowledge exactly this point in the paperpic.twitter.com/dYxfSq8LCm
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A 76% reduction in hospitalization in the ivermectin group. Same region, same season, same variant, controlled for age and comorbidities based on 230,000 people. Your theory that it's something else is an isoteric-sounding explanation. You aren't defending the truth.
-
Same income? Same HbA1c? Same access to hospitals? Same index of homelessness? Etc etc etc. As the authors say, you can only control for the factors you measure, and even with comorbidities they only had data on a small number it seems
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.