(1)I had a really enjoyable and spirited conversation with @GidMK . We see eye to eye on some things, and disagree about others. Yet were able to carry on a pleasant and productive discussion. The dude is a good faith actor who knows his shit and is committed to scientific rigor.
-
-
Again, you ground your mistrust in tiny impactless items. You have an enormous improvement in hospitalization (76%) and your arguments absolutely can't explain even 10% of the impact. Do you think your points would turn the results insignificant?
-
Of course - residual confounding can entirely reverse the effects of an analysis. That's a very well-demonstrated epidemiological fact https://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-modules/bs/bs704-ep713_confounding-em/BS704-EP713_Confounding-EM4.html …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry, what's SES? I'm very much wanting to follow and evaluate your arguments. Thank you!
-
Oh. Socioeconomic status, right?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.