(1)I had a really enjoyable and spirited conversation with @GidMK . We see eye to eye on some things, and disagree about others. Yet were able to carry on a pleasant and productive discussion. The dude is a good faith actor who knows his shit and is committed to scientific rigor.
-
-
As to residual confounding - there are numerous potential differences between people who got packs and those who didn't. For one thing, I don't see any discussion of SES in the paper, which is a pretty big potential confounder
-
Again, you ground your mistrust in tiny impactless items. You have an enormous improvement in hospitalization (76%) and your arguments absolutely can't explain even 10% of the impact. Do you think your points would turn the results insignificant?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.