"By all indications, the use of ivermectin in Peru was widespread in EVERY region, not just the 'maximal' one" False Up until Feb 2021 almost 70% never taken IVM in Peruhttps://twitter.com/jjchamie/status/1365856703917531136?s=20 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
That's certainly not true based on the news reports that you cite, which indicate only a few thousand medical packs being handed out! And again, there is a lot of evidence that people were taking large volumes of the drug well before those campaigns
That's certainly true, based on real facts Few thousand medical packs being handed out in regions to the entire vulnerable population. Here is the campaign description (in Spanish)https://rpp.pe/peru/actualidad/coronavirus-en-peru-conoce-como-funciona-la-operacion-tayta-noticia-1286058 …
Right - and across those regions the population over 60 is what, 1 million people? 2 million? So this program maybe treated 1% of the entire 60+ population, which means that the other 29% got their ivermectin elsewhere
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.