I'm not suggesting anything about other people. I'm saying you are ignoring information, and this could be leading your POV This isn't incompetence.
Most of them used it as a prophylactic I.e. taking it entirely out of sync with your paper's hypothesis. But again, the problem is that you simply do not know who was taking ivermectin, how much, and when, so there's no measure of exposure in the paper
-
-
The local campaigns delivered IVM to every person over 60 or with comorbidities in a 3-day period. The sharp drop in deaths happened after. The campaigns were performed at different dates in different regions. The Who, When and How is there. And the results too.
-
That's certainly not true based on the news reports that you cite, which indicate only a few thousand medical packs being handed out! And again, there is a lot of evidence that people were taking large volumes of the drug well before those campaigns
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
