Obviously the at all is for covid, not the demonstrated benefits for other diseases
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are your comments on fluvoxamine based on the one non-randomized trial you've linked to in this article?
-
Is this arbitrary difference in your standards of rigor for evidence between IVM and fluvoxamine perhaps a transparent attempt to seem openminded and unbiased, rather than, say, a pedantic stooge?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Guess I'm gonna have to buy some horses so I have something to do with my stash of horse de-wormer
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“At all”? You really can’t fathom that it might have some anti inflammatory effects?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A dose of 1700 μg/kg (i.e., 8.5 times the FDA approved dose of 200 μg/kg) is 250 times less than the dose needed to achieve plasma concentration that worked in vitro. How anyone can get past this fact is beyond me. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7404744/pdf/BCP-9999-na.pdf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great read... and humorous. Don't forget to read the photo descriptors. So let's put Ivermectin to bed.pic.twitter.com/jTe8xVyQIj
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Was the joint press release from FLCCC/BIRD, claiming that even without Elgazzar their results were fine ever followed up with any formal publication? I can find nothing.
-
Nope. But Hill's meta-study will be updated without Elgazzar soon.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.