This "mini-review" into ivermectin for COVID-19 was recently published concluding that ivermectin is effective and should be used for the disease A brief peer-review 1/npic.twitter.com/KdxoQlqkXA
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
10/n The review also briefly discusses the biological plausibility of ivermectin use. This is pretty meagre, but the 2 studies cited don't seem to be terriblepic.twitter.com/VDkTQdS5bF
11/n Some of the issues above are definitely not the fault of the authors - for example, the Cochrane review came out after this paper had already been accepted - but they do make me disagree entirely with the conclusions of the paper
12/n I think that the Cochrane review into ivermectin remains solidly the best evidence around, arguing that we should only be using the drug in the context of a clinical trial until we have better evidencepic.twitter.com/PA5h7p5pTg
So the graph perfectly support the paper. Also you are using whole country, when in fact it was first used outside lima and it was banned in Lima. Only when cases fell everywhere but Lima, it was used there too. But I suppose you knew that when you wrote this thread?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.