The question now becomes why they are the only meta-analysts who've revised their study after a key ivermectin paper was retracted...
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yup! The Bryant/Lawrie meta-analysis should do the same. My money says they won’t…
-
Their risk of bias analysis highlighted the author’s risk of bias more than the included studies
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree that all things considered it is: " a fantastic display of scientific integrity". In a better world it would just be: "scientist doing their job".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
They shouldn't rush the revision as more retractions are coming, right...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.