Why are we not surprised? Not that it will make any difference - the IVM promoters will just squeal about cover-ups and fake news and so on...https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1424836896190984216 …
The confidence interval ran from 0.6 to 1.29, so it's similarly consistent with a large benefit and large harm as well
-
-
I ask you two favours and one question. The first favour is to read the entire thread. The second is to keep the definition of cherry-picking in mind for the question, which is "did you apply the same scrutiny to the most negative findings as to the most positive?"
-
I think it's a worthwhile point - the uncertainty runs in both directions. And yes, thus far I've yet to find an obvious fraud or even extremely low-quality study with null findings. Quite remarkable actually
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
