Sorry, I meant UNCRITICALLY included Belarus data in their research. Obviously people who've included it but also pointed out how problematic it is are not incompetent
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Re: "A reasonable test of whether people have are basically competent is whether they included Belarus' COVID death data in their research"
@dr_barrett@WrongAgainIvor@greg_travis@thereal_truther https://twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan/status/1361754553306263553 … https://twitter.com/FatEmperor/status/1322910307942105088 … https://twitter.com/FatEmperor/status/1348983873942806529 …pic.twitter.com/sMoHLO24iq
-
Though I can understand a competent researcher including Belarus as being an unexplained outlier that went against their main conclusion. It can be a sign of integrity to include something weird that undermined your conclusion; you can later be vindicated https://twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan/status/1385297461502226436 …pic.twitter.com/sJ5XdM0zwy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
cc
@Pinboard@matthew_d_green https://mobile.twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1263088176828055552 … https://mobile.twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1261963461891768322 … https://mobile.twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1271934877990961152 … https://mobile.twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1263818459751702528 … https://mobile.twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1271941043173224448 … (Note that he never corrected himself and muted me) -
...and same for Africa. No correction there either. It's so fun to do takes! You get famous for the good ones and can completely ignore the bad ones! If only life was everywhere like that!https://mobile.twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1263074933673844739 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.