For those interested, the number of very likely fraudulent ivermectin studies showing a huge benefit has shot up from 1 a few weeks ago to 5 now
I suspect there's more to come 
-
Show this thread
-
News will probably be out this/next week on two of those studies, and the other two we're still working on
3 replies 7 retweets 98 likesShow this thread -
But the broader message here is that *all* of these potential frauds were so low-quality that no one should've ever used them as evidence. They were, at face-value, woeful
3 replies 18 retweets 215 likesShow this thread -
Also, it should not have been a group of unpaid randoms working on this in their spare time, why aren't the ivermectin crowd critically appraising their own studies and CHECKING THIS STUFF?
18 replies 16 retweets 216 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @GidMK
Seems like a good way to improve on peer review would be to hire a bunch of these 'randoms' and pay them to do this as their day job.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.