For those interested, the number of very likely fraudulent ivermectin studies showing a huge benefit has shot up from 1 a few weeks ago to 5 now
I suspect there's more to come 
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @GidMK
Can you name them please? So far I've seen strong criticisms of Elgazzar, Carvallo, and Niaee. Are these the ones you're referring to? And which others?
6 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @GoodKingElliot @GidMK
Good King Elliot Retweeted Health Nerd
I guess this is #4?https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1424525769242406915 …
Good King Elliot added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GoodKingElliot
Nope that's not fraud, all the data is publicly available. It's just not a useful analysis of public data
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
Could you please name the five then? I have been pro-ivermectin, but I respect your work.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GoodKingElliot
Not going public with all of them until we can prove that they never happened. News should drop on the first one in the next week or so tho, that one I think is basically proven
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @GoodKingElliot @GidMK
If there are valid critiques, or even reasons for suspicion, I want to hear them. I want to remove what is problematic and assess what is left. But you are impugning a whole body of literature by hundreds of authors, without making specific accusations. This is problematic.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GoodKingElliot
Not at all. There are studies that I've publicly noted are well conducted. Many of the researchers shared their data, which is a very good sign
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
Don't you see the replies to your post? They are mocking people who believe in science and want to give ivermectin a chance. You are slandering the whole literature in this way, when there are specific studies (which you won't name) which are problematic.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
We've named one, and I've talked for weeks about how astonishingly low quality much of the research base is. Fraud is a specific accusation, but relying on most of the studies that I've talked negatively about would be a terrible decision either way
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.