The majority of reviews I've seen that strictly adhere to Cochrane methodology are, oddly enough, those published by the Cochrane Collaboration. I wonder why that is 

-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
WTH?!?! What's the point of peer review then?
-
it's cheaper for journals than employing professional reviewers, I guess.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think one of the big lessons of the pandemic will be how flawed the peer review process can be at times. The amount of garbage that has been published and then subsequently retracted is astounding
-
Think it was known b4, but it's certainly made it much more visible. "Science" has a # of concerning issues to resolve. Repeatability is a big one; professional incentives (e.g., publish or perish); lack of publication of studies which dup others (Important part of science!), etc
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So great that they are running their own collaboration. I’m sure replicating the expertise and resources it takes to pull this off was easy peasy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends on the peer reviewers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does Cochrane methodology differ from the PRISMA guidelines?
-
One is for conducting a review, the other is for writing one up. The R in PRISMA stands for reporting. The C in MECIR (the Cochrane checklist) stands for Conduct. There is overlap, because you report what you did, but they serve different purposes.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I’ve seen this w checklists, like PRISMA. “We used [whichever] checklist to guide this study.” But they clearly did not check all the boxes on the list nor submit the list as suppl material. :/
-
Pet. Hate. If you uses it, you submits it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.