Wow, what a, uh, review. They cite the retracted, potentially fraudulent ivermectin study as fact, which gives you some idea of the thrust of this paperhttps://twitter.com/PierreKory/status/1423905770933047297 …
-
-
One of the most unfortunately prescient aspects of that movie contagion is the opportunists lining up to promote a bogus cure (in the movie it's forsythia), so they can line their pockets. Here's a case of humans being too damned lamely predictable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@GidMK - how many of the meta-analyses quoted in this recent paper include the retracted study by Elgazzar? Have any of them bothered to repeat/recalculate with this paper removed (& does it change the results)? Guessed you would be the man who knows thank you
-
This article addresses that somewhat.https://twitter.com/Weltenbrandt/status/1423933102708207616?s=19 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
). Crickets from every science desk of every major news outlet across the US… again.