I ran out of characters to include "Victoria". But Victoria is part of Australia and I'm sure you know that.
-
-
Replying to @youyanggu
Well, in the same way Florida is a part of the United States and therefore I assume it is justifiable to argue that since a lack of restrictions has seemingly caused hospitals to fill up with COVID-19 there that this is true of the entire US
2 replies 0 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
Actually... that's exactly what many people are saying!
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @youyanggu
Lol. Well they'd be just as wrong I guess! I do disagree with pretty much the entire tweet anyway, but the Australia thing is Jussi obviously incorrect. Ignoring the impact of vaccines in the UK is particularly confusing
3 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
To be absolutely fair, I'm sure I can find many instances where you refer to the US Covid response when you only meant to refer to states like Florida. And I do talk about the impact of vaccines in the 3rd Tweet.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @youyanggu
I mean, feel free to go for it I've tried to be specific. And I mean the graph in your first tweet, it's pretty clearly incorrect, restrictions were gradually relaxed as vaccine rates went up, then there was a peak of infections in the unvaccinated
4 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @youyanggu
Pretty much the opposite of what you'd expect to see if restrictions didn't work tbh
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
Though using that logic, doesn't that mean restrictions don't work, since the moment it goes away cases will surge? Of course, unless you are Victoria and implement 6 lockdowns.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @youyanggu
Unless, as in the UK, you impose restrictions until you're sufficiently well-vaccinated to manage with only a small wave, in which case the restrictions save numerous lives. I guess it depends on your definition of 'works'
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @youyanggu
To be fair here, none of this is the slightest bit convincing, arguing about whether 'restrictions' work is a pointless waste of time because they vary widely from place to place. At the inflection point in your graph the UK had I believe only dropped indoor masking
3 replies 0 retweets 11 likes
So presumably when you say "restrictions" you are not referring to the lockdown, which ended months earlier. Indeed, by your logic the lockdown was effective and only indoor masking is worthless
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @youyanggu
It’s all about using data to prove your narrative. And I hate it....
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.