Now that Laurel Hubbard has failed to win at the Olympics, I guess all the bad-faith nonsense about transgender athletes dominating women's sport will be entirely revised? Right?
And I would contend that you cannot argue that someone has an *unfair* advantage if they do not win. Doping is a perfect example - if it did not make people win more, would we still ban it?
-
-
Yes it should still be banned but that is really a flaky argument from you. This New Zealand athlete may not have won in the olympics but another NZ athlete missed the opportunity to compete. There are consequences
-
That is untrue - the other competitor did not come close to qualifying. But at a more basic level, if you define "unfair" as any modest success for transgender athletes, then your definition of fairness doesn't seem very scientific
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.