Now that Laurel Hubbard has failed to win at the Olympics, I guess all the bad-faith nonsense about transgender athletes dominating women's sport will be entirely revised? Right?
-
-
Fair, but my point still stands. You are arguing based on a single example (who could be an outlier) & motivated by politics, not science. It's a really bad idea for a science communicator to do this, because it saps your credibility (which is otherwise excellent, I'm told).
-
I think the context here is important, which one tweet doesn't capture - the debate has very much centred around one or two examples (and particularly Hubbard), and thus my tweet was in response to this
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.