Now that Laurel Hubbard has failed to win at the Olympics, I guess all the bad-faith nonsense about transgender athletes dominating women's sport will be entirely revised? Right?
-
-
I'm not sure why you assume that I have a female housemate. I don't. My point is that suggesting that knowledge of a single example (which could be an outlier) is sufficient to understand a wider phenomenon doesn't seem very scientific. I don't recommend arguing this way.
-
The success or failure of Laurel Hubbard (or any other individual) doesn't settle the debate over transwomen in women's sports either way. I don't need to have heard of Laurel Hubbard (I've never heard of her) to know this.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Because failing at one competition, at well below her best lift, isn’t really an argument for or against. It’s entirely irrelevant to the debate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.