Something that I keep seeing pop up is the idea that meta-analysis somehow eliminates issues with the underlying research This is just confusingly incorrect
-
-
Think of it like an average (because it essentially is one) - if one study measured weight, another height, and yet another blood pressure, averaging the results from them all would give you a number with narrow confidence intervals that had literally no meaning
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.