Something that I keep seeing pop up is the idea that meta-analysis somehow eliminates issues with the underlying research This is just confusingly incorrect
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @GidMK
That’s a straw man. No one says it eliminates all issues with underlying research. The argument is that it can help account for variations in things like dosage and methods. Large scale crts are also worthless if you give the thousands of participants the wrong dosage.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @chad_senger
That's simply not something that meta-analysis can do. It does not account for variation in dosage and methods, all it does is weight studies by their variance and provide a weighted mean/median
10:20 PM - 28 Jul 2021
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.