Another day, another two ivermectin studies that have impossible values in their tables of results. Both included in meta-analyses (rated as high risk of bias this time) This is getting truly insane
-
-
He’s retweeting stuff by someone who uses a Yellow Star of David saying “not vaccinated.” Nope, not worth dealing with.pic.twitter.com/GcSJ0Ighhz
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What I would disagree with in your review is that Gilead, the company, has a conflict to study their drug. This is just the way it is, that companies have to study the drugs they want to get authorisation for. They do this in accordance with guidelines and regulatory expectations
-
It is the responsibility of the regulators to review the results of the study. The assessment is pretty much made transparent in the EPAR, in the EU.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

