Another day, another two ivermectin studies that have impossible values in their tables of results. Both included in meta-analyses (rated as high risk of bias this time) This is getting truly insane
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @GidMK
Any info on the Shouman study. I’m not understanding if the sample size @ 50 ppl not matching the meta data. Ty. see attached study https://clinicaltrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/61/NCT04422561/Prot_SAP_000.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @GidMK
The sample size is 50 friends and family. The study starts with 359. The FLCCC meta has this study at 304. Why are these all different? Ty
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @ceegarciabee
Huh you're right the abstract contradicts the results - it should be 76 cases not 50. The 304 is correct after exclusions, but it's very odd I agree
3:24 PM - 27 Jul 2021
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.