Another day, another two ivermectin studies that have impossible values in their tables of results. Both included in meta-analyses (rated as high risk of bias this time) This is getting truly insane
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @GidMK
Have you had a chance tt go over the ones done by Chamie that have somehow been included into Bryant and Lawrie's meta-analysis?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @donnghaile @GidMK
It was cited in this, looks shoddy at best to a lay person like myself.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/ …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @donnghaile
Uh, yes at a brief look that isn't really a scientific paper it's more of a poorly written blog
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @GidMK @donnghaile
Not the meta-analysis, the preprint thing, just to clarify
3:08 PM - 27 Jul 2021
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.