The entire ivermectin for COVID-19 literature is just...awash with this absolute trash. Studies that are pre-registered after publication. Tables of results that contradict the text. Percentages that are impossible
-
-
Show this thread
-
Endless examples of RCTs where the analysis plan is a single sentence long (we did chi-squared and some t-tests, p<0.05 was significant)
Show this thread -
And these are just the SURFACE issues. The deeper stuff is even more wild - some of these trials almost certainly have missing data that they didn't report, and others may never have happened at all
Show this thread -
How has this been missed, over and over again, by serious researchers? Many of these studies are included in meta-analyses. Most of them are cited more than a dozen times. And they are either totally woeful or potentially fraud
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Who is behind the big Ivermectin push? What do they get out if it?
-
FLCCC is using these studies and hooking people up with Ivermectin at about $100 for their recommended course.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Honestly unsure. Some are in predatory journals, but some are in reputable places even though they are trash
End of conversation
-
-
-
Which 2 now? Has anyone written up these new opinions on the studies? Thanks
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Does seem to be a regular occurrence
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.