10/n The first table of results, purportedly reporting the first experiment, is incorrect - both totals are wrongpic.twitter.com/0JeritZW7W
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
20.5/n If this study did occur, which record is right - the graphs? The pre-registration? Are none of the numbers correct?
21/n This adds to the long and growing list of concerns about ivermectin literature. It is extremely worrisome that studies like this have been cited multiple times and referenced as evidence for benefit
22/n I'm not saying that this research was fraudulent, but what I will say is that I do not see how anyone who read this paper could've cited it as a resource for anything because the issues are...numerous According to Google Scholar, cited 22 times
23/n update. This is a very bad sign. Authors refusing to communicate and share data is a very common feature of scientific fraud (i.e. Surgisphere)https://twitter.com/K_Sheldrick/status/1421795122291777537?s=19 …
24/n it is often impossible to know if a study is fraudulent or not, but regardless until the lead author shares anonymised patient data we are forced to treat this study as if it was
Hopefully we get the data 
25/n The full story on this paper is now out, and it's extremely concerninghttps://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1433555208211079171?s=20 …
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.