I've just found another ivermectin study that was rated as low risk of bias by two separate teams of meta-researchers but contains very crudely impossible values in the paper Do people even read the studies they rate???
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @GidMK
The type of evaluations you're doing haven't been systematized. If you could make it simple & rule-based, then I'd bet it would be possible. We use Jadad, etc, because everyone can.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JeremySussman
Rating of bias is inherently a bit subjective, but this particular paper is one of the lowest-quality pieces of research that I've never come across. Tons of basic errors and mistakes. And yet, low risk of bias
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
I totally agree. & what you find is more important than what Jadad, etc, do. But I think for data & design problems, etc, to be regularly ID'd, they will need a Jada-like paint-by-numbers score to guide it. Something usable by a med student & doesn't need you or
@sTeamTraen.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Just make more of him, should be easy
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.