BIG NEWS New paper out in BMJ Global Health with a brilliant team of researchers on the health impacts of lockdowns Long story short - lockdowns aren't ideal, but COVID-19 outbreaks are probably much worse 1/nhttps://gh.bmj.com/content/6/8/e006653 …
-
-
9/n Mental health in particular is a tricky subject. Lockdowns certainly have not been associated with increases in suicide, but there have been consistent worries about mental health
Show this thread -
10/n That being said, there's also evidence that people dying from COVID-19 in large numbers is not, uh, ideal for mental health, and disentangling those two impacts is extraordinarily hardpic.twitter.com/9JRg7HQt8y
Show this thread -
11/n What does this all mean? Well, it takes us back to the start of the thread Lockdowns = bad COVID-19 = probably worse
Show this thread -
12/n If government interventions against COVID-19 work, then it's likely that they are beneficial on the whole. There may be lockdowns that have been both good and bad, and it will take us a long time to solve that riddle
Show this thread -
13/n The bottom line is pretty simple really - all of this is far more complex than a simple yes/no. Rather than the tedious rhetoric of "lockdowns bad", we should be asking WHICH lockdowns were good/bad, and WHY
Show this thread -
14/n All that being said, based on current best evidence we do not think it is possible to say definitively what harms lockdowns do have to health, but we can say that it is likely that these harms are not worse than the disease itself
Show this thread -
15/n Thanks to the amazing team who've worked on this
@DrSamirBhatt@LeaMerone@GYamey@flaxter and all the rest of the authors!Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.