I've just found another ivermectin study that was rated as low risk of bias by two separate teams of meta-researchers but contains very crudely impossible values in the paper Do people even read the studies they rate???
-
-
thought so :-)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Will you make a thread about the study?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Every time someone puts a p-value in Table 1 of an RCT an angel cries.
-
* Every time someone puts a p-value in Table 1 of an RCT an angel cries. (p<.00001)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Curious. Is calculation error an actual 'bias', or just an error?
-
In this context it would be part of the "reported results" area of bias. There are several places where the authors have made very strange decisions in their analysis
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The pre-treatment characteristics did not seem very balanced to me. The control arm had 45 percent cough. Much less in the two treatment arms.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Whose meta-analysis is this screenshot from?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This trial was self financed by the doctor. He did ask Merck to be involved but they refused.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.