This is not unexpected. If the authors of the retracted ivermectin study claim that the data was not really the data for their paper, they now need to explain: 1. Why did they upload fake data that quite clearly matched their results?https://twitter.com/PierreKory/status/1416080575442587653 …
My stance on vaccines is similarly evidence-based. I continue to be open to the possibility that ivermectin works, but given these issues it is clear that the evidence to date is not sufficient to make any firm conclusions
-
-
Maybe add that you believe we should have better evidence by now? I've just heard an
expert on BBC using some pretty strong words regarding the fact we haven't.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.