This is not unexpected. If the authors of the retracted ivermectin study claim that the data was not really the data for their paper, they now need to explain: 1. Why did they upload fake data that quite clearly matched their results?https://twitter.com/PierreKory/status/1416080575442587653 …
-
-
Covid arguments remind me of climate arguments sped up x1000. ivermectin reminds me of “it’s the Sun,” with a certain group always demanding more study even though there’s no real evidence (or expectation) that it can be responsible for the past 50 years of climate change.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IVM @ 90% effective is not enough to end pandemic. Also must convince majority of the world that it is 90% eff. & then you need everyone to use it. That will never happen since so many people are lined up against it. Guardian even ties IVM to “right wing figures” in 1st sentence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does cayenne actually work? ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
