This is not unexpected. If the authors of the retracted ivermectin study claim that the data was not really the data for their paper, they now need to explain: 1. Why did they upload fake data that quite clearly matched their results?https://twitter.com/PierreKory/status/1416080575442587653 …
-
-
5. (cont.) Seriously, how do the authors explain the fact that they uploaded a dataset, said it was the data of their study, and now claim it wasn't? How do we reconcile that with what they claim now?
Show this thread -
6. It is also worth noting that this is not actually a public statement by the authors, but rather a tweet supposedly on their behalf by someone else. I await them actually speaking because it's possible this isn't actually Professor Elgazzar
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.