When people say that non-randomized evidence is somehow superior to randomized trials, worth considering the reasons we run RCTs in the first place
-
-
That being said, RCTs are not always possible for a variety of reasons. But if they clearly ARE, say because we're trialing a drug for an infectious disease, then you have to wonder why someone would say that they aren't the best evidence
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.