My new piece on ivermectin for COVID-19, potential fraud, and some really astonishing implications Thread to come soonhttps://gidmk.medium.com/is-ivermectin-for-covid-19-based-on-fraudulent-research-5cc079278602 …
-
-
The plagiarism I can see and it's weird The statistics is above my head but I have no trouble accepting your and
@jamesheathers analysis there with just a scant understanding of what a standard deviation and confidence intervals are I am quite convinced it's bogus But why? -
The whole timeline of Ivm is an series of questions. I still do not understand why monash have not spoken out. I still don't understand why they never published their second trial that they received funding for and why borody would risk his reputation on their in vitro study.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There are mistakes and then there are mistakes that take more work to create than not making a mistake It's like grilling a beef tenderloin. Anyone can do it well. But it takes a real pro to screw it up
-
Have you seen this lot?
@mountainvmd....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Indeed that would be unprofessional. As a member of the public, I'm hoping that asking these questions will lead to full investigation of the motivation.
-
I assumed it was people shilling for Big Sheepdip
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Who funded the original study? People can be convinced to go against their morals with $$.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I have verified the plagiarism part, so that part is absolutely fraud.
-
This is shocking. And based on this kind of study, how many people are taking Ivm

- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.