Because I am one a few doctors discussing the facts about risks vs benefits? Like all other therapies?
-
-
No, because you muddle any legitimate points you’re trying to make with conspiracies and conspiracy theorists and that ruins your credibility. You say you aren’t anti-vax but what % of your tweets encourage vaccinations vs discourage them?
1 reply 2 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @mattahrens @gorskon and
Those that needed got. Smoke supply. Huge amounts of natural immunity. Ignored by most. Stop jabbing kids and pregnant mobs. And I am outpic.twitter.com/1TZvQpUaFh
9 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Plenty of people could be persuadable with clearer positive messaging and less anti-vax noise. Lots of people will die because they weren’t vaccinated.
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @mattahrens @gorskon and
And lots die because they were vaccinated. Sadly. Uniquely. Horrifically. Should be
@nytimes headlines every day15 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @drjkahn @mattahrens and
They definitely don't. If you compare the crude rate of vaccine reports to all-cause mortality it would suggest that vaccines prevent vast numbers of deaths (this, too, is misleading, but it shows why using VAERS data in this way is problematic)
4 replies 2 retweets 33 likes -
2017 US death rate 74/100K. 9048 VAERS deaths in 183.8M ppl with at least one dose of vaccine is 4.9/100K. So if all ppl that die (any cause) post vac are listed in VAERS, it seems vaccine prevents death from all causes. Yes, very crude but illustrates the issues w VAERS
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
7 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
What is that table even from? Memes are useless as evidence sadly
2 replies 4 retweets 31 likes -
CDC weekly data.
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
Which dataset? The CDC publishes literally hundreds of weekly datasets
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.