A fascinating COVID-19 pipeline that I had not thought about much is woeful, heavily-biased preprints of studies making their way into meta-analyses and being used in treatment protocols I reckon it's a very big problem
-
Show this thread
-
-
-
Replying to @GidMK
Has anyone done a more in-depth critical analysis of the ivermectin meta-analyses that I could read?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @teavangelize @GidMK
The Bryant meta analysis is the most comprehensive
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Bannisterious @teavangelize
Depends what you mean by comprehensive, but probably the network meta-analysis of COVID-19 treatments currentlyhttps://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m2980 …
1 reply
1 retweet
3 likes
-
-
The Cochrane review into ivermectin is ongoing, but when it comes out that'll probably be the best
0 replies 1 retweet 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.