The recently-retracted bogus “vaccines kill as many people as they save” paper in Vaccines has the same author as the not-yet-retracted bogus “children are being poisoned by face masks that trap 0.3nm CO2 molecules but can’t trap 100nm SARS2 viruses” in JAMA How does this happen
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @greg_travis @ChristosArgyrop
There's more to consider than just diameter. Co2 molecules are quite sticky, while sarscov2 virions have a lipid bilayer making them very slippery
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
For a more detailed explanation see my upcoming paper in JAMA
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @james1chas3 @greg_travis1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
-
I nominate
@GidMK as EiC of @jama_rectraction journal. He has shown tremendous commitment to removal of#jamacovidtrash.2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @mikejohansenmd @ChristosArgyrop and
What's really impressive is how many truly woeful papers they've managed to publish in only 12 months
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @mikejohansenmd and
I'm still confused how a paper that said that glasses were protective against covid by using a 1980s sample as an absurd comparator was published in a JAMA journal. It's just laughable
2 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @ChristosArgyrop and
Where exactly is the 1980's comparison group on the evidence hierarchy?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
We all know that IF is the only determinant of the level of evidence
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.