Amazing that contrarian medtwitter accounts shared this garbage study & lent credibility to ithttps://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1411005081902673921 …
-
-
Replying to @dfreedman7
Should add: the deep shittiness of this study does not require you to look at the data or the guts of the method in the supps. It should be obvious to anyone from the text from looking at the method and reported values. My conclusion is anyone giving props to this didn't read it.
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @jamesheathers @dfreedman7
Or, alternatively, that they're shit at doctor stuff.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
Replying to @jamesheathers @dfreedman7
Can't be good at doctor stuff if you don't read the research that your work is based on
3:09 PM - 2 Jul 2021
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.