10/n If you assume that everyone who stays alive will get infected without a vaccine eventually - which is a fact - the ABSOLUTE risk difference approaches the RELATIVE risk difference, and so NNTV = 1/0.84 = 1.2 I.e. 1 life saved for every 1.2 vaccines given!
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @GidMK
No, it’s not a fact. There exists pre immunity and cross-immunity. Why are so many of you falling in the fallacy of assuming “everyone” will get infected as if natural immunity doesn’t exist? That is plainly false! https://idp.nature.com/authorize?response_type=cookie&client_id=grover&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Farticles%2Fs41586-020-2598-9 … https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22036-z …
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Hache_Berlin @GidMK
I stopped reading the thread about here. It's a childish simplification of the complexity in epidemiology and immunology to state that everyone is eventually going to have every transmittable disease without a vaccine.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Josephs42921408 @eliabennis and
True, but it's also fair to say that SARS-Cov-2 is highly transmissable, so a large percentage will likely get infected at some point. I think his critique of the paper makes perfect sense though. It's crap. So was the FDA not announcing the ARR from the trials. Time matters...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MakingMoneyFast @Josephs42921408 and
The paper is not crap. There might be points open for discussion, but calling it crap is simplistic. Health nerd is a pharma shill and will cherry pick all he can to discredit the article and perpetuate the narrative. Follow
@waukema to learn more about the data they used.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Hache_Berlin @MakingMoneyFast and
Who do you think is paying me? Please be as specific as possible
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @MakingMoneyFast and
Find my answer in the quoted tweet.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Hache_Berlin @MakingMoneyFast and
"Pharma shill" is a tedious insult, but if you're accusing me of being paid by some corporation presumably you have evidence that this is the case, or at least a specific company that is paying me that you can identify So who is it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @MakingMoneyFast and
Your panic making, support of unscientific lockdowns and stupid masks is also quite tedious. Any case, I replied you with names in the quoted tweet. Go there and read it, it’s on my profile.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Hache_Berlin @GidMK and
Hache 🏴 Retweeted Hache 🏴
In case you cannot find ithttps://twitter.com/Hache_Berlin/status/1410628085309976589 …
Hache 🏴 added,
Hache 🏴 @Hache_BerlinI specifically said “shill” and not “paid shill”, but now that you have unconsciously confirmed that you get paid, I would bet on any of those that benefit the most from the lockdowns and the narrative you defend: Gates F., Wellcome Trust, Bloomberg F., CCP, any Big Pharma… https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1410560039887069184 …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Can confirm I've never received payments from any of those organisations nor any pharmaceutical companies at all 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.