16/n Using reporting systems like this is a common anti-vaccine trope. We KNOW that many of the events in the reporting system ARE NOT LINKED TO VACCINATION because we investigate them carefully
-
-
27/n This is a prime example of what
@jamesheathers and I wrote about recently - the study got through peer review, may be retracted, but the damage has already very much been donehttps://www.statnews.com/2021/06/08/scientific-publishing-new-weapon-for-the-next-crisis-the-rapid-correction/ …Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about a post-publication review?
-
That's what I tried to do on twitter

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"assumed failed peer-review" as a label from 1 individual / a contradiction in itself
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.