The current peer review system is extremely broken, but it's also really hard to think of ways in which we could do it better (believe me I've tried)
I'm not sure I agree in this context. Datasets in public health are mostly collected from people who do not explicitly consent to research and the data is used under very strict conditions - it's a big ask to share that regardless of the context
-
-
If people didn't consent to research, why is there research using their data? And, I guess, why is there data? My impression was that people generally *did* consent to research, but with limits.
-
Depends on where you live, but often large public health research projects are done under a waiver of consent because of the deidentified nature of the research - this is then subject to very strict oversight which becomes impossible if you share the data freely
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.